Abu Dhabi Healthcare Information and Cyber Security Standard
We support your ADHICS review with roles, permissions, two-factor sign-in and audit records, while UAE hosting provides a confirmed starting point for deployment review.
Set by Department of Health, Abu Dhabi
What is built
- Roles and permissions control access within the selected product scope.
- Two-factor sign-in is available for the supported product workflows.
- Audit records capture read and write activity for review.
- Flow policy workflows retain named preparation, review and approval signatures.
- UAE hosting is confirmed; exact deployment specifications need agreement.
What your auditor or regulator sees
Your team can inspect access settings, relevant audit records and signed policy stages within the selected products. Those records support a review of how the facility manages information, but they do not establish that every ADHICS control has been implemented. Hosting details, technical specifications and organisational procedures must be examined alongside the application evidence.
How the record supports your review
Start with the access questions your facility needs to answer: who can open a record, what work their role permits and what evidence is available when activity is reviewed. Demonstrate representative staff roles and a record interaction rather than relying on a general security label. Keep the organisation’s approval and review responsibilities clear.
DoH currently presents ADHICS V2 through its AAMEN programme. Use the applicable standard and your assessment scope to identify the evidence needed. This page does not claim a complete clause-by-clause mapping, certification, immutable audit storage or automatic fulfilment of every control. Policy templates also need professional review before use.
Encryption standards, backup arrangements, recovery targets, security testing and enterprise identity specifications still need confirmation. Flow’s clinical incident workflow is not evidence of a managed cybersecurity response service. Bring the relevant control questions to a technical review so each statement can be tied to demonstrated functionality, supporting documentation or an explicit contractual responsibility.
NextHealth is Alpha Health Group’s health technology division. Its healthcare operating and consulting background informs the workflow discussion; your facility remains responsible for assessing the controls and authorising the arrangements it adopts.
What we claim, precisely
The system holds the evidence; the facility's accountable person attests. Nothing here asserts that a facility is compliant.
Common questions
-
No ADHICS certificate or complete control assessment is claimed. The page identifies confirmed controls and records that support your facility’s review, alongside technical and organisational evidence that still needs confirmation.
-
DoH’s AAMEN page currently presents ADHICS V2. Confirm the applicable assessment scope with your responsible team; this content does not claim that every V2 control has been mapped or independently assessed.
-
Not in the supplied product brief. Request the deployment’s encryption, backup and recovery specifications before relying on them in your assessment; the access-control evidence does not answer those separate questions.
-
A managed cybersecurity response service is not established. Flow’s clinical and facility incident records serve a different purpose, so security monitoring, escalation and notification arrangements require separate confirmation.
Preparing for ADHICS
Open the sandbox and look at the readiness view, or ask us to walk it against your own standard set.